Japan’s Institutional Investors Re‑Evaluate Digital Assets With Purpose

Japan’s institutional engagement with digital assets has never been driven by speed. It has been shaped instead by governance discipline, regulatory sensitivity, and consensus‑based decision‑making.

Nomura and Laser Digital’s 2026 Institutional Investor Survey on Digital Asset Investment Trends, conducted among 518 investment professionals in Japan, captures a market that is beginning to reposition itself cautiously, but with intent.

On the surface, the change appears modest. Thirty‑one percent of respondents now report a positive view of cryptocurrencies, up from 25% in the previous survey, while those holding negative views declined from 23% to 18%. Neutral sentiment still dominates. Yet the underlying shift is more structural, with 58% expressing a positive outlook, pointing to a clear relationship between familiarity and confidence.

This relationship is critical in a market like Japan’s, where investment decisions are evaluated not only on risk and return, but on process integrity. As understanding deepens, uncertainty becomes more manageable.

Growing Investment Appetite

The survey suggests that scepticism is increasingly less about principle and more about preparedness.

Sixty‑five percent of respondents now view cryptocurrencies as a diversification opportunity, up from 62% previously. When asked about the primary reason for investing over the next three years, half of respondents cite diversification, followed by crypto’s perceived low correlation with traditional assets. This matters since diversification aligns with established portfolio construction logic, making digital assets easier to evaluate within existing governance frameworks.

Another progressive element is that Intent has followed perception. Seventy‑nine percent of respondents indicate plans to invest in cryptocurrencies, but timing remains measured. Only about 55% of those prospective investors expect to invest immediately or within the next year, with others indicating a longer horizon. This gap between intent and action reflects institutional sequencing rather than reluctance. Committees are taking time to develop internal frameworks, validate controls, and align stakeholders before capital is deployed.

Where barriers remain, they are increasingly practical. Respondents continue to cite the absence of established valuation methods, concerns around counterparty risk, and high volatility as key reasons for not investing. Regulatory considerations, particularly treatment under capital regulations, supervisory guidance, and taxation, also remain influential.

In effect, these are operational questions tied directly to investment approval and oversight.

Demand & Allocation Patterns

Encouragingly, internal constraints are easing. Compared with the previous survey, the share of respondents citing insufficient information to convince decision‑makers declined by more than ten percentage points, while shortages in expertise among investment teams and evaluation functions also fell sharply. Resistance persists most prominently where decision‑makers show low initiative to engage with the asset class, but the data suggests that improved information is beginning to close that gap.

As institutions move from evaluation to design, investment preferences are also evolving. Exchange‑traded products remain the most popular access route, reflecting the importance of liquidity and transparency. At the same time, interest in fund‑based exposure, including private funds, has increased significantly, signalling a desire for professionally managed solutions aligned with institutional mandates.

Beyond access, demand is broadening toward functionality. More than 60% of respondents expressed interest in staking, lending, derivatives, and tokenised assets, indicating a growing focus on income generation and asset utilisation rather than pure price exposure. Digital assets are increasingly being assessed by how they behave within portfolios, not simply how they perform directionally.

Stablecoins highlight this practical turn. Respondents point to use cases such as cash management, tokenised securities investment, and cross‑border payments, while showing a strong preference for stablecoins issued by major financial institutions across JPY, USD, and EUR denominations. Issuer credibility and regulatory alignment clearly matter more than experimentation.

Despite rising interest, allocations remain conservative. Most respondents anticipate eventual exposure of 2–5% of total assets, reinforcing that digital assets are being positioned as a diversification sleeve rather than a core holding.

Taken together, the survey depicts an institutional market moving forward deliberately. Japan’s investors are building conviction through education, governance readiness, and product alignment. This type of discipline may slow adoption, but it also suggests that when capital is deployed, it will be durable.

-END-

Disclaimer

This material is marketing communication and not investment advice. Virtual Assets may lose their value in part or in full and are subject to extreme volatility at times. Full disclaimer: https://laserdigital.com/marketing-disclaimer/